Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 20:04
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 134
58% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 220
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1410 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 92.3
60% 76 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 79.5
57% 68.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,308
Write 2677
Mixed 2,525
631% 2,837 MB/s
4K Read 114
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 85.7
329% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 425
DQ Mixed 443
330% 438 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
88GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 219 290 216 217 292 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 178
Write 94.4
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 252
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 29.2
69% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 159
124% 169 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
356GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 110 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 113
Write 113
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 109
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
396GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 139 137 138 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 169
Write 152
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 138
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
242GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 129 128 127 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 128
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C10-8GTX 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 18.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback