Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 05:14
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 419
51% 389 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 13AA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 140
Parallax 160
130% 153 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 134
Splatting 104
111% 141 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 467
Write 446
Mixed 360
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 54.1
180% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
25GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 149 147 147 149 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 165
Write 164
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 148
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 112%
BUFFALO External HDD 1.5TB
354GB free, PID 01ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 28 31 30 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 26.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 29.2
34% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
14GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 31 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 153
Write 34.3
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 25.8
72% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.7
132% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback