PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation 490 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0GU083 |
Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080425 |
Uptime | 2.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 14 '19 at 19:09 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | EGY-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5335
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
70GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 124 128 126 129 127 MB/s
|
70%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 100 97 99 104 MB/s
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X53651stBench 44%, 504 samples | 9x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples | 8x |
CPU: Intel Xeon 51301stBench 37%, 237 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 6x |
Quadro FX 3500NvidiaBench 1%, 426 samples | 5x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $100 |