Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '19 at 07:43
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 77.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 228 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 646 66% 532 Pts	64-Core 869 54% 869 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372C) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 24.9 Parallax 31.8 29% 30.8 fps	MRender 36.4 Gravity 33.4 Splatting 32.9 28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB 11,560 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 342GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 293 219 219 219 223 MB/s Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	74.4% Very good	Read 205 Write 107 Mixed 88.5 SusWrite 268 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 40.6 116% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 225 187% 267 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 102%
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43 7,269 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 223GB free Firmware: M2CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 465 441 440 464 472 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 318 Mixed 439 SusWrite 459 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 44.1 147% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 299 236% 324 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87 21,339 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 160GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 85 85 86 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 83.3 Write 68.3 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 84.6 54% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESEK.M8FE 2x8GB 3,139 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 29.5 91% 32 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 25.5 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	66x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	83x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	75x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	64x

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $608

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16