Apple MacBookPro9,1

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Apple MacBookPro9,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-4B7AC7E43945597E
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '16 at 22:45
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3615QM 2,657 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 177 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 395 47% 361 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Apple(106B 00FC) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7570 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.73% Terrible	Lighting 7.57 Reflection 6.88 Parallax 8.59 6% 7.68 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 8.9 Splatting 9.83 8% 9.54 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.73% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 174GB free Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1042 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 852 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 196 196 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 488 (C2) HDA temperature 71 56 188979871773 (F1) Unknown 100 100 144713	62% Good	Read 501 Write 343 Mixed 347 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 8.1 40% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 47.1 78% 155 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 95%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 86GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 367 Write 316 Mixed 340 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 3.94 29% 9.72 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 27.7 DQ Mixed 4.55 9% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 80%
Sandisk Ext SSD 240GB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 8GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 332 Write 318 Mixed 337 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 4.66 38% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 17.8 DQ Write 32.6 DQ Mixed 4.68 9% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 4GB free, PID 1057 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 79.5 Write 83.8 Mixed 47.7 88% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.21 66% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 18 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 18.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MacBookPro9,1 Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro9,1

CPU
Core i7-3615QMIntelBench 62%, 2,657 samples	96x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	45x
Core i7-3820QMIntel $275Bench 66%, 3,135 samples	14x

GPU
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	151x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	1x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
MX500 1TBCrucial $72Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	6x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	87x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	41x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363