Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '19 at 03:33
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 81.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 221 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 707 70% 571 Pts	64-Core 914 56% 914 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0521) CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Lighting 67.1 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 84 55% 73.2 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 69.1 Splatting 58 53% 66 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$39 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 749 424 427 428 429 428 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 2,571 Write 2262 Mixed 1,580 SusWrite 481 384% 1,723 MB/s	4K Read 62.4 4K Write 163 4K Mixed 85.4 290% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 929 DQ Write 788 DQ Mixed 856 642% 858 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 302%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 117GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 114 115 116 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 159 Write 139 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 114 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 1x8GB-$25 15,542 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 16.7 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,409x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	541x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	321x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	229x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $23Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $669

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16