Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 28 '19 at 04:38
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 125
57% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 280
32% 250 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 59.3
0% 30.4 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 39.6
33% 39.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 36 51 43 48 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 376
Write 283
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 47.2
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 5.3
54% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 12.9
20% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
293GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 85 89 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 120
Write 108
Mixed 74
SusWrite 87
72% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
82GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 58 57 56 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 57
Write 52.5
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 56.8
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
58GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 0 0 3.4 54 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 35
Write 36.9
Mixed 29
SusWrite 24.8
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580
201GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 42 56 44 49 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 59.9
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 49.3
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 75%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 14.3
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 14.7
22% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 Corsair CMX4GX3M1A133 Corsair CMX4GX3M1A133 Corsair CMX4GX3M1A133 16GB
800, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $436
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback