Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics69.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 17:47
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 155
52% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.8% Good
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 125
Parallax 113
63% 105 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 91.8
Splatting 102
82% 101 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 246 262 256 237 257 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 401
Write 299
Mixed 228
SusWrite 254
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 35.5
122% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 169
130% 177 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
916GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 182 179 179 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 180
Mixed 126
SusWrite 179
124% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D21BCT1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback