Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 05:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$95
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 164
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 491
49% 401 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2980) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1542 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.4% Good
Lighting 85.8
Reflection 88.4
Parallax 85.9
70% 86.7 fps
MRender 83
Gravity 79.3
Splatting 70.2
63% 77.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 187 208 207 207 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 406
Write 364
Mixed 194
SusWrite 195
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 33
119% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 93.1
DQ Mixed 36.6
36% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST9320423ASG 320GB
154GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 31
Mixed 25
SusWrite 30.5
22% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Ser 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 13.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback