Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 17.6 1-Core 64.4 2-Core 132 36% 71.4 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 512 46% 389 Pts	64-Core 712 44% 712 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.86 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30% Poor	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 34.2 30% 33.7 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 35.7 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209 7,834 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: LADi SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 161 151 160 159 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 301 Write 162 Mixed 212 SusWrite 157 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 31.6 108% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 137 128% 199 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 82%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 180 179 180 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 198 Write 177 Mixed 134 SusWrite 179 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 0.8 30% 8.7 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 10.3 DQ Mixed 1.2 2% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0-YK0 2x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 10.4 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 339 12% 339 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	497x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	262x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	184x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16