Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170925
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 136
2-Core 260
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 833
79% 653 Pts
64-Core 1084
67% 1084 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 200
Parallax 203
164% 201 fps
MRender 240
Gravity 210
Splatting 139
155% 196 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 172 172 172 170 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 415
Mixed 368
SusWrite 209
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 50.9
184% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 340
255% 341 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 152 160 159 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 86.2
Write 118
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 152
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
5% 2.2 MB/s
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 130 131 131 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 144
Write 108
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 130
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FBD2 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback