Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108 6,076 User benchmarks, average bench 58% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 172 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 262 35% 262 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 82A5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 7.96 Parallax 5.69 4% 6.12 fps	MRender 9.05 Gravity 4.97 Splatting 0.09 3% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-CE256-HP 256GB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3C1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 208 161 159 212 214 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 429 Write 389 Mixed 346 SusWrite 202 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 42.8 145% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 39 DQ Write 72 DQ Mixed 45.3 37% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSO4GX4M1A2133C15 2x4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.4% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18.9 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 19.4 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	215x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	111x
HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples	12x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	18x
SD8SB8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,064 samples	15x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 98%, 1,495 samples	14x

RAM
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	30x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	22x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	16x