HP ProDesk 400 G3 DM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82A5
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170929
Uptime8 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 11:58
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 187
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 279
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 82A5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 5.53
5% 6.71 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 5.07
Splatting 12
7% 8.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-CE256-HP 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3C1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 226 204 220 229 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 443
Write 393
Mixed 352
SusWrite 216
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 48.5
159% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 39.2
DQ Write 75.8
DQ Mixed 47.7
39% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSO4GX4M1A2133C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G3 DM Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback