Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190924
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '19 at 14:01
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 58.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 251 76% 144 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 993 88% 747 Pts	64-Core 2,504 155% 2,504 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Gigabyte(1458 2281) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.1 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.7% Average	Lighting 43.3 Reflection 61.7 Parallax 94.8 35% 66.6 fps	MRender 61.1 Gravity 64.7 Splatting 79 57% 68.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 310 294 288 284 287 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 470 Write 404 Mixed 357 SusWrite 299 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 24.6 85% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 153 113% 150 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 93GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 118 119 119 158 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 138 Write 130 Mixed 90.7 SusWrite 124 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 537GB 1,079 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 16GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 44 42 41 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 118 Write 120 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 40.8 70% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.9 236% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 13TB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 8TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 25 25 24 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 3,140 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	MC Read 51.5 MC Write 51 MC Mixed 51.5 147% 51.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 30.7 SC Mixed 22.3 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	17x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 128%, 25 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 94%, 8,912 samples	4x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,053

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16