Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display705 x 530 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 14:13
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 92.1
55% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 112
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 88.5
6% 88.5 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 51%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 54GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 214 219 218 220 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 412
Write 474
Mixed 225
SusWrite 211
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 27.2
108% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 374
271% 351 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
301GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 60 65 63 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 154
Write 91.5
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 61.6
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 64 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback