Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B89
Motherboard	MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190720
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 06:48
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 79.6 1-Core 140 2-Core 256 87% 159 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 746 73% 597 Pts	64-Core 879 54% 879 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16% Very poor	Lighting 17.4 Reflection 20.7 Parallax 19.3 14% 19.1 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 24.2 20% 24 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 560ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 83 88 83 83 MB/s Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.2% Above average	Read 215 Write 123 Mixed 146 SusWrite 84.7 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 28.2 110% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 84.1 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 87 71% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 83%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 245GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 161 155 155 159 162 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 118 Mixed 49 SusWrite 157 88% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 57GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 128 125 127 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 134 Write 139 Mixed 32 SusWrite 126 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 2x8GB 7,360 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.2% Very good	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 30.6 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 27.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	323x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	274x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	236x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	100x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	99x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	95x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	324x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	222x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	176x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $404

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16