Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 26 '19 at 14:55
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 221
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 307
41% 309 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
ASRock(1849 5902) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4678
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.69
Parallax 3.5
0% 1.42 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 3.17
Splatting 9.7
6% 6.34 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 81 81 60 65 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 47.4
Write 114
Mixed 30
SusWrite 76.8
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 103%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.7 4 3.2 3.6 3.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 3.7
9% 9.23 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9932301-P01.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.4% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback