Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M/U3S3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 13:58
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 330
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus R5 230
Asus(1043 3015) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 2.03
2% 2.21 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.72 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian H100 32GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.6 21 26 19 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
Read 126
Write 39.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 16.7
36% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
284% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
143GB free
Firmware: ST1OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 96
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 102
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GR1600D364L9/2G Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M/U3S3 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M/U3S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback