Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 19:53
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 186
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 346
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 48.2
51% 55 fps
MRender 44.9
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 50
40% 48.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 144
Write 224
Mixed 171
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 31.6
127% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 17.1
64% 144 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
82GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 54 51 58 63 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 56.1
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 44%
Maxtor STM3160811AS 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 72 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 70
Write 67.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 70.7
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB
45GB free
Firmware: JPGOA3GC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 67.2
Write 66.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 106
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 30.3
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $241
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback