Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '19 at 11:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 706
69% 566 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 91.1
56% 76.2 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 57
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW190903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 373 347 312 244 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 318
Write 400
Mixed 332
SusWrite 311
77% 340 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 15.3
100% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 22
83% 183 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 166%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
596GB free
Firmware: JEDOA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 100 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 98.2
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 99.5
63% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TZD256G816U26-SS001 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 33.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 28.7
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback