Today's hottest deals

HP xw6400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP xw6400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A04h
Memory3.6 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 29 '16 at 19:00
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5345
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 53.9
35% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 207
19% 157 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 47.6
Parallax 41.4
41% 46.5 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 44.1
Splatting 39.7
34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
312GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69% Good
Read 120
Write 121
Mixed 87.2
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.33
90% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 76.2
Write 77.3
Mixed 41.6
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.37
96% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
34GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 46.9
Mixed 40.8
32% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.34
78% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback