Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170 4,850 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 209 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 402 53% 395 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Lighting 73.5 Reflection 76.7 Parallax 73.3 60% 74.5 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 70.7 56% 67.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1229 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 38 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 62 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3168114196	45.1% Average	Read 428 Write 172 Mixed 231 61% 277 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 1.88 65% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 6,400 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 3TB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 23.4 Write 33.9 Mixed 13.4 17% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.95 4K Mixed 0.89 196% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 236%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25 4,291 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 56GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 131 Write 57.9 Mixed 104 116% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.64 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 1.17 107% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-154.A00LF 4x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.7% Good	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 18.6 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 21 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1225 v3Intel $170Bench 69%, 4,850 samples	176x
Pentium G3220Intel $36Bench 48%, 19,337 samples	13x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples	52x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples	8x

RAM
HMT451U7BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 30%, 163 samples	10x
HMT451U7BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 232 samples	7x
HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 2,366 samples	6x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $260

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16