Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 123 56% 89.3 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 489 44% 370 Pts	64-Core 1,219 76% 1,219 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate USB 160GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 117GB free (System drive), PID a013 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 25 14 5.5 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 25.2 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 15.8 29% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 33%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB 620 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.7 4.4 7 7 7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.7% Terrible	Read 21 Write 7.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.3 11% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 51% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.7% Great: 7%
UDinfo UF2 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.2 9.4 8.9 9.1 8.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.31% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 9.5 Mixed 9 SusWrite 9 15% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.31% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4A-H9 4x16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 24 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	47.5% Average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.8 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 70%

Battleship

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v21stBench 68%, 827 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	3x
Xeon E5-2609 0IntelBench 56%, 759 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro M6000NvidiaBench 73%, 640 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	2x

RAM
72JSZS4G72L1G9E2A7 8x31.9GBUnknownBench 120%, 5 samples	5x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 73%, 237 samples	2x
M393B2G70BH0-CK0 2x16GBUnknownBench 34%, 14 samples	2x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $330