Asus P5GC-MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5GC-MX  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070801
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 27 '17 at 17:18
Run Duration398 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$12
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 42.5
34% 45.3 Pts
4-Core 42.3
8-Core 42.5
6% 42.4 Pts
64-Core 42.1
3% 42.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8334) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 75.9
Mixed 32.8
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.15
41% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
293GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 97.8
Mixed 75.3
67% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.32
89% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB
273GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 26.2
Mixed 28.8
37% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 2GB
0GB free, PID 5151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 23.6
16% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
UDinfo UF2 4GB
0GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.53% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 5.56
Mixed 7.3
12% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.64
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.32
47% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.53%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5GC-MX Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5GC-MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback