Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '19 at 14:31
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 78.2 1-Core 132 2-Core 264 86% 158 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 970 89% 745 Pts	64-Core 1,431 89% 1,431 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Lighting 68.8 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 60.2 56% 66.1 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 66.2 Splatting 66.7 55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 715GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1522 1485 1526 1528 1512 1501 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	308% Outstanding	Read 2,528 Write 2,284 Mixed 1,866 SusWrite 1,512 459% 2,048 MB/s	4K Read 60.8 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 78.3 256% 86.2 MB/s	DQ Read 967 DQ Write 589 DQ Mixed 833 606% 796 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 308% Great: 410%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 52GB free Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 244 120 121 123 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 456 Write 363 Mixed 278 SusWrite 162 70% 315 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 19 74% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 83.3 DQ Mixed 40.8 47% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 55%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 133 135 134 134 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 105 Write 70.3 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 130 62% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 83%
WD WD80EMZZ-00TBGA0 8TB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 153 154 155 152 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 146 Write 149 Mixed 69 SusWrite 153 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.2 212% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 117%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 633GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 96 95 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 89.2 Write 88.8 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 94.8 65% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$79 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2TB free Firmware: CC98 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 91 125 136 85 21 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 118 Write 128 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 80.9 66% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 75%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1.5TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 101 104 104 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 50.8 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 103 49% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0 16% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x8GB 2,333 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.1% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 24.6 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 25.3 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16