Jingsha Q77

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Jingsha Q77 (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190107
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '19 at 04:44
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 96.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 218 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 677 66% 543 Pts	64-Core 823 51% 823 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 374A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64% Good	Lighting 80.1 Reflection 79.7 Parallax 68.8 65% 76.2 fps	MRender 80.2 Gravity 74 Splatting 72.2 61% 75.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB 9,229 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0328A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 134 23 28 38 6.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 419 Write 360 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 54.5 46% 211 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 166%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 430GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 135 135 138 138 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 163 Write 160 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 136 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- 32GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	MC Read 50 MC Write 49.6 MC Mixed 45.9 139% 48.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.9 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 53.2 75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q77 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Jingsha Q77

CPU
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	4x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	3x
Xeon E5-2630 v2IntelBench 67%, 1,838 samples	1x

GPU
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	2x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
MIXZA-240GB 240GBBench 58%, 44 samples	2x
S3500 Series 240GBIntel $135Bench 77%, 644 samples	1x

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples	2x
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $113

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16