Lenovo 10AXS4A100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10AXS4A100  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1840T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 134
59% 96 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 127
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.9% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 54.5
Parallax 50.1
49% 54.7 fps
MRender 44.9
Gravity 53
Splatting 50.6
41% 49.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM010-1KJ15C 320GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 88 87 95 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 90.5
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 86.3
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 0467 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 6GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback