Lenovo 10AXS4A100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10AXS4A100  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150317
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 27 '20 at 21:10
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1840T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 49.8
37% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 45.5
8-Core 46.2
6% 45.8 Pts
64-Core 50.9
3% 50.9 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.4% Below average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 48.6
Parallax 45.1
44% 49.1 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 45.6
28% 33.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM010-1KJ15C 320GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LIM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 62 78 78 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 81.7
Write 102
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 74.1
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 0467 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 6GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback