Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120217
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 21:30
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 474
63% 471 Pts
64-Core 461
29% 461 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 52
Reflection 46.9
Parallax 36.7
42% 45.2 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 49.7
39% 47.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,223
Write 5,357
Mixed 5,621
1,278% 5,734 MB/s
4K Read 405
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 297
1,124% 316 MB/s
DQ Read 1,538
DQ Write 1,281
DQ Mixed 1,403
1,052% 1,407 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
258GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 76 73 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 80.5
Write 67.5
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 74.6
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
107GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 54.2
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 58.1
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56
449GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 82 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 71.3
Write 71.9
Mixed 30
SusWrite 80.5
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback