Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8509
Memory	46.1 GB free of 56 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190510
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '19 at 15:51
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989 11,853 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 88.3 1-Core 135 2-Core 273 91% 166 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 915 85% 711 Pts	64-Core 1,541 95% 1,541 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% HP(103C 8554) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.5% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 112 Parallax 114 96% 115 fps	MRender 159 Gravity 114 Splatting 93 96% 122 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GB 2,393 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20140000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 424 424 423 420 424 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 865 Write 1,039 Mixed 459 SusWrite 422 156% 696 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 55.5 178% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 751 DQ Write 885 DQ Mixed 730 575% 789 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 171%
WDC WDS100T2B0B 1TB 6,502 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 917GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 398 445 456 448 455 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 451 Mixed 360 SusWrite 417 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 33.1 124% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 289 DQ Mixed 247 205% 297 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 122%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3TB free Firmware: MX6OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 195 196 193 198 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 198 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 194 109% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 859B CT16G4DFD8266.M16FD 859B CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 56GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.7% Excellent	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 25.5 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 25.5 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 127%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	364x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	256x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	198x

SSD
SSDPEKNW010T8H 1TBIntelBench 183%, 4,172 samples	270x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	104x
hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBSKBench 131%, 6,904 samples	67x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 86%, 2,002 samples	411x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	286x
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	164x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $876

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16