Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '20 at 14:32
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 121 2-Core 251 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 693 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 966 60% 966 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6393) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 23.1 Parallax 18.8 16% 20.6 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 20 Splatting 26.1 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 447GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 867 834 840 974 969 1000 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,191 Write 1,002 Mixed 870 SusWrite 914 223% 994 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 45 147% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 213 160% 213 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 255%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 283GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1652 954 556 555 555 553 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 1,733 Write 1,631 Mixed 687 SusWrite 804 271% 1,214 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 42.8 137% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 237 173% 226 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 254%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB 412 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 246GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 5.8 3.5 4.4 3.9 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 101 Write 107 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 5.5 52% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 112%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 64GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 9GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5 4.3 4.1 3.5 4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 15GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 15 10 9.3 8.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 48.8 Write 49 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 11.2 37% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 95%
Disk Name 240GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 168GB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 26 25 19 23 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 37.7 Write 37.8 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 22.4 45% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 8 869% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 8.6 DQ Write 19.1 DQ Mixed 4.4 831% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 79%
LaCie Porsche Design 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 10GB free, PID 107a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 4.8 0 3.8 14 6.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 36 Write 9 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 7.2 20% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.7 102% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 32GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 42 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 38.1 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.3 SC Write 40.7 SC Mixed 32.1 95% 33.4 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	48x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	20x
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	19x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	11x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	9x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBAdata $82Bench 242%, 74,184 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	5x
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $330

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16