Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds)
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '21 at 14:29
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 82.9 1-Core 122 2-Core 240 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 482 62% 467 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 113 Parallax 132 102% 124 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 115 Splatting 105 105% 133 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0AB0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,415 Write 4,430 Mixed 4,592 1,071% 4,812 MB/s	4K Read 238 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 142 609% 168 MB/s	DQ Read 817 DQ Write 613 DQ Mixed 739 546% 723 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 80GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 23GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 13 14 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 208 Write 120 Mixed 51.4 SusWrite 20 73% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 64%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 456GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 79GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 13 14 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 169 Write 150 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 13.5 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 274% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 429GB 248 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 177GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 12 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 194 Write 106 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 12.1 71% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 99%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 64GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 8GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 12 14 14 13 31 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 200 Write 53.4 Mixed 83 SusWrite 16.6 66% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 161GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 45GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 14 12 14 14 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	58% Above average	Read 190 Write 26.3 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 12.5 57% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 83%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 86GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 66GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 13 13 14 14 19 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 201 Write 168 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 16.5 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB 4,498 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 13 13 14 13 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 202 Write 152 Mixed 89.7 SusWrite 19.6 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 18.4 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	120	27"	1280 720	AUS2788 PG279QE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,415x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,169x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1,078x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	376x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	368x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	306x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	214x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	196x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	149x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16