Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory55.4 GB free of 64.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 17:48
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 165
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 629
56% 476 Pts
64-Core 943
58% 943 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 87.7
55% 70.8 fps
MRender 57.4
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 74.5
54% 64.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 662 199 0.5 565 119 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 250 0.5 223 121 0.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,448
Write 1,016
Mixed 1,298
SusWrite 139
217% 975 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 42.5
155% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 213
163% 219 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 124%
Great: 177%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 3.5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 0.5 23 17 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 91.4
Write 79.3
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 15.6
52% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 6.9
1,196% 6.87 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 67%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2.5TB
120GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 0.5 23 18 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.5% Below average
Read 96.7
Write 72.5
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 15.9
53% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 6.8
1,185% 6.83 MB/s
Microsoft Virtual Disk 5.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 0.5 23 17 0.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 90.2
Write 92.5
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 15.6
55% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 6.9
1,202% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 98GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback