Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 08:55
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 697
70% 569 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.3% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 48.2
47% 53.2 fps
MRender 45.1
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 49.4
40% 48.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/350G 350GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 27 63 70 83 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 481
Write 424
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 110
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 1
51% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 98
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 1.2
19% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 79%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
34GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 91 97 69 76 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 492
Write 454
Mixed 434
SusWrite 95.7
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 32.4
146% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 50
105% 209 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 92%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
786GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 479 480 483 487 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 481
Mixed 447
SusWrite 473
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.2
202% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
71GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 148 158 138 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 159
Write 158
Mixed 84
SusWrite 141
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 113%
Generic MassStorageClass 537GB
500GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 8.2 6 4.8 8.4 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 2.8
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 6.8
7% 6.15 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 22%
Generic Mass-Storage 537GB
500GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.4 4 4.8 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11.5
Write 0.2
SusWrite 4.4
5% 5.37 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 32.8
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 27.4
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $312
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback