Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-R  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 18:43
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 79.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 476
64% 481 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 37.4
32% 35.7 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 38
Splatting 36.1
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 117 60 66 71 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 498
Write 415
Mixed 357
SusWrite 126
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 23.6
122% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 27.3
66% 133 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
165GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 94.6
Mixed 60
SusWrite 111
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59%
Great: 68%
Toshiba MQ01ABB200 2TB
213GB free
Firmware: AY000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 58 60 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 63.7
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 59.9
38% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2324WT.001 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback