HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8399
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 06:45
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 198
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 548
54% 443 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
HP(103C 83C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.26
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 73
38% 62 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 54.7
46% 57.1 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 144 174 176 188 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 193
Mixed 70
SusWrite 172
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 30.4
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx Builds (Compare 368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback