Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 17:08
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 8.84
1-Core 124
2-Core 240
58% 124 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 485
56% 433 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 53.8
46% 55.3 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 46.5
38% 46.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7256G 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 394
Mixed 38.7
66% 304 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 0.2
53% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 0.2
37% 91.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
339GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 417 146 105 99 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 469
Write 426
Mixed 361
SusWrite 191
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 37.5
143% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 230
201% 298 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
380GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 97 98 98 87 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 73
Write 90.3
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 92.2
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 19.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 415
10% 415 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback