HP 550-109

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-109  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 00:47
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 40.2
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 116
41% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 193
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics + R7 200 Dual Graphics
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Lighting 8.37
Reflection 9
Parallax 10.6
7% 9.31 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 8.57
7% 8.11 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 67 76 112 117 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 116
Write 141
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 100
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 109%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB
4GB free, PID 3423
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.1 4.1 4.6 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
4% Terrible
Read 13
Write 4.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.3
8% 6.65 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-109 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 550-109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 126% - Outstanding Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback