Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D2550 408 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	23.4% Poor	Memory 43.3 1-Core 7 2-Core 15.6 18% 22 Pts	4-Core 21.8 8-Core 26.3 3% 24 Pts	64-Core 25.6 2% 25.6 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 2070) 512MB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 2.03 2% 1.7 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.57 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 86 67 110 107 109 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.1% Poor	Read 201 Write 156 Mixed 115 SusWrite 99.9 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 8.5 29% 8.27 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-053.A00L SNY1333D3S9ELC/2 6GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3.4 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 13%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Atom D2550IntelBench 25%, 408 samples	2x
Atom D2700Intel $96Bench 26%, 250 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
MKNSSDCR60GB-DX7 60GBMushkinBench 52%, 17 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273BH1-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 50 samples	1x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GBSamsungBench 44%, 17 samples	1x
SUPERTALENT02 1x4GBUnknownBench 24%, 1,071 samples	1x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16