Average Bench: 1.99% (453rd of 635)

Based on 3,176 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 1050, 10DE 0DED, 10DE 0DF7 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 520M averaged 98.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 6.8fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 6.9fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 520M is just 0.65%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 520M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 7.17fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 4.47fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,176 samples)
Min Avg Max
5.5 Lighting 6.8 7.9
5.9 Reflection 7.17 8
1.8 Parallax 4.47 6.2
1.8% 6.15 fps
Min Avg Max
5.7 MRender 6.53 7.93
5.6 Gravity 6.9 8.03
0.2 Splatting 5.08 6.24
2.03% 6.17 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 364.51
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7
Parallax 1.8
2% 5.2 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 7
Splatting 5.6
2% 6.37 fps
Sanyo(144D C597) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 6
2% 6.87 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 5.7
2% 6.33 fps
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.68
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 1.9
2% 5.6 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 5.7
2% 6.3 fps
Asus(1043 1682) 1GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 6
2% 6.47 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 5.8
2% 6.37 fps
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Lighting 7
Reflection 7
Parallax 3.8
2% 5.93 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 5.7
2% 6.3 fps
Sony(104D 9089) 512MB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 395 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 382.5
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6
2% 6.8 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 5.5
2% 6.2 fps
Asus(1043 1682) 1GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 4.8
2% 6.03 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0.2
2% 4.43 fps
Sanyo(144D C597) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 1.8
2% 5.37 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.2
2% 4.37 fps
Asus(1043 1742) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.57
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 7
Parallax 2.2
0% 3.13 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 5.6
2% 6.23 fps
3,176 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,836,827 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 3,176 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 1742) 19% 2% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C597) 19% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 10% 2% ± 0%
Sony(104D 9089) 8% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1682) 8% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 397D) 5% 3% ± 3%
Acer(1025 0505) 4% 2% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 209F) 3% 2% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C0B2) 2% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 16F2) 2% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0573) 1% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0507) 1% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0512) 1% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0488) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84CF) 1% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FC90) 1% 2% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FC71) 1% 2% ± 0%
Device(1854 0865) 1% 2% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 2500) 1% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 397F) 1% 3% ± 0%
Device(1854 3001) 1% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0574) 1% 2% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 1635) 1% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2660) 1% 5% ± 5%
Compal(14C0 0059) 1% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 053A) 1% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 1094) 0% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0522) 0% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0575) 0% 2% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 1655) 0% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 338B) 0% 2% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 0% 2% ± 0%
Device(1854 0871) 0% 2% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C0A0) 0% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 109C) 0% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 108C) 0% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 056B) 0% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0509) 0% 2% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE A219) 0% 2% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3652) 0% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 10AA) 0% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0611) 0% 2% ± 0%
Quanta(152D 0880) 0% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2180) 0% 2% ± 0%
Acer(1025 055A) 0% 2% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 520M Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K43SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $245

Popular GeForce GT 520M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

18 months ago.

Still better than my integrated GPU in Intel Pentium P6200 :D


Your
opinion?
635 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback