HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory5.1 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime14 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 14:27
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B97
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 87.2
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 93.8
50% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 166
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
EVGA(3842 1529) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 0.59
2% 1.89 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 1.83
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 76 38 78 88 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 80.3
Write 85.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 70.2
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 41GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback