Average Bench: 3.78% (416th of 683)

Based on 16,289 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 1286, 10DE 1288 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 720 averaged 96.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 4.76fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 4.62fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 720 is just 3.33%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 720 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 4.64fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 5.24fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 16,289 samples)
Min Avg Max
3.5 Lighting 4.76 7.7
3.5 Reflection 4.64 6.2
3.4 Parallax 5.24 9.1
3.87% 4.88 fps
Min Avg Max
3.7 MRender 4.35 5.3
3.2 Gravity 4.62 7.9
4.1 Splatting 5.06 8.5
3.67% 4.67 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Zotac(19DA 3308) 2GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 8.8
6% 7.23 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 7.3
6% 6.53 fps
Sanyo(144D 80A8) 2GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 8.5
6% 7.07 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7.1
6% 6.5 fps
MSI(1462 3381) 1GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.37 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.2
3% 4.23 fps
Asus(1043 8670) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 4
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.9 fps
MSI(1462 8C90) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.52
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 4.2
3% 4.27 fps
Asus(1043 84F2) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.8
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.9 fps
MSI(1462 3130) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.8
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.87 fps
Sapphire(174B 326B) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.8
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.87 fps
16,289 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 54,252,612 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 16,289 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B 326B) 19% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1087) 18% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 8C90) 12% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3130) 9% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2928) 6% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8670) 6% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84F2) 5% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2724) 3% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 366D) 3% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8641) 3% 6% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2722) 2% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3381) 2% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1288) 2% 3% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1130) 2% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 720A) 1% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2927) 1% 5% ± 1%
Asus(1043 84FA) 1% 3% ± 0%
Device(1642 3E56) 1% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D 80A8) 1% 6% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3133) 1% 3% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 0% 3% ± 0%
Elitegroup(1019 1025) 0% 6% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1081) 0% 3% ± 0%
Palit(1569 1288) 0% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1104) 0% 3% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 1288) 0% 3% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 720 Builds (Compare 10,633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $335

Popular GeForce GT 720 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

3 months ago.

Can even play roblox lmao, it sucks and I had to set the graphic settings as low as possible.


Excellent

10 months ago.

My mate has one, he can run chrome. I cant (with a 3080)


Poor

10 months ago.

Cheap and reliable, powered two 1366x768 monitors and even did some light gaming for over 4 years.


Good

6 months ago.

Very cheap card, enough to do usual work tasks (word, browsing etc.). Good as a temporary card if you don't have integrated graphics.


Excellent

3 years ago.

Good budget card, similar to 2007 cards.


Terrible

15 months ago.

This was a decent graphics card back in its day. Today, however, it's barely an excuse for a GPU - pretty much any modern game has to run on low graphics quality plus the lowest resolution. I couldn't play any game made 2010+ with full resolution, most of the time I had to use the 800*600 setting. You can run games from the late 90's fine though, I was able to play (the first) Half-Life with a great FPS. If you're looking for a budget graphics card, best to look over this one. I found a NVIDIA Quadro K620 on amazon for $100, way more worth the price than this piece of trash


Your
opinion?
683 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $446Crucial MX500 250GB $35
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3050 $292Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $365Nvidia RTX 3070 $538Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback