Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190516
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '20 at 03:30
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 77.5 1-Core 126 2-Core 246 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 861 82% 675 Pts	64-Core 1,204 74% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 2183) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 170 Reflection 161 Parallax 174 139% 169 fps	MRender 184 Gravity 145 Splatting 105 114% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM04B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 92 95 93 98 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 352 Write 152 Mixed 214 SusWrite 102 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 34.9 125% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 121 134% 232 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 236GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 397 464 445 443 440 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 468 Mixed 468 SusWrite 441 106% 470 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 48 155% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 372 280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 133%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190 33,949 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 636GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1516 1532 1534 1525 1092 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,498 Write 1,513 Mixed 1,088 SusWrite 1,227 300% 1,331 MB/s	4K Read 50.2 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 59.2 193% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 843 DQ Write 445 DQ Mixed 321 325% 536 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 282%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 600GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 100 Write 98.5 Mixed 100 SusWrite 83.8 71% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 85%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$185 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 113 114 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 126 Write 101 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 113 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 98%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 828GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 37 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 34.5 Write 34.8 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 36.2 47% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.3 213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 99%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 963GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 113 112 114 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 144 Write 156 Mixed 96.7 SusWrite 114 171% 128 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.3 222% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 121 115 116 117 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 111 Write 119 Mixed 90 SusWrite 119 150% 110 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 0.9 369% 4.6 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 4.5 DQ Mixed 1.3 199% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 18,655 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.7% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 24.3 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 24.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)