Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '20 at 07:14
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 204 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 847 79% 656 Pts	64-Core 1,086 67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.8% Very good	Lighting 99.9 Reflection 103 Parallax 96.5 81% 99.8 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 88.5 Splatting 76.2 77% 96.6 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 51GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 158 156 154 151 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 489 Mixed 461 SusWrite 200 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 60.9 209% 75.6 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,388 Write 1,464 Mixed 1,253 375% 1,702 MB/s	4K Read 58.6 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 80.2 272% 96.7 MB/s	DQ Read 973 DQ Write 1,159 DQ Mixed 998 771% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 84GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 311 310 311 311 310 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 489 Mixed 461 SusWrite 335 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 61.3 208% 75.2 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 360 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 129%
Intel SSDSCKKW256H6 256GB 1,222 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 237GB free Firmware: LBF010C SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 107 103 104 104 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 454 Write 352 Mixed 399 SusWrite 138 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 46.6 160% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 222 186% 268 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 89%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230 19,674 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 110 108 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 187 Write 132 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 108 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2.2 387% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 94%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7.4 9.9 9.4 10 9.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	5.68% Terrible	Read 10.2 Write 4.7 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 9.1 8% 6.68 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 35% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.68% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2460 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	72.2% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 21.3 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 21.2 56% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,518x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	836x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	574x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	402x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	342x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	146x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $650

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16