| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160205 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 07 '17 at 11:56 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.7%
Above average
|
56% 89.2 Pts
|
26% 195 Pts
|
13% 206 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37%
Below average
|
33% 56.1 fps
|
45% 55.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
104%
Outstanding
|
98% 439 MB/s
|
160% 53.7 MB/s
|
118% 194 MB/s
|
|
|
58.3%
Above average
|
50% 231 MB/s
|
100% 40.1 MB/s
|
44% 81.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42%
Average
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
27% 9.6 GB/s
|
50% 80.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 89 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 19x |
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 11x |
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 8x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 8x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $375 |