Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190524
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '20 at 09:19
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 88 1-Core 114 2-Core 239 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 621 69% 544 Pts	64-Core 683 42% 683 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.7% Good	Lighting 85.9 Reflection 77.3 Parallax 68.4 70% 77.2 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 72.6 Splatting 71.3 57% 69.6 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 81 74 82 75 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 407 Write 327 Mixed 286 SusWrite 91.7 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 8.3 42% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 74.3 DQ Write 68 DQ Mixed 32.3 35% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 55%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 149 152 148 151 150 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 214 Write 159 Mixed 102 SusWrite 139 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 0.7 8% 3.73 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 10.6 DQ Mixed 1.3 2% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB 7,481 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.9% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 23.6 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 21.1 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,090 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	3,203x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,501x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	460x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	723x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	563x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	514x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	435x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	309x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	298x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	206x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	162x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16