Dell PowerEdge R710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell PowerEdge R710
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R710  (all builds)
Memory43.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180522
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 10:27
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 151
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 476
47% 386 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 0.09
30% 22.9 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 36.8
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 33%
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 20.2
18% 19.9 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 17.4
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 11 16 13 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 579
Write 174
Mixed 449
SusWrite 16.4
67% 305 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 29.2
106% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 138
105% 140 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 95%
Dell PERC 6/i 499GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 24 34 30 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 50% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36KSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 6x8GB
6 of 18 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 20.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R710 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback