Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '20 at 18:16
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594 5,754 User benchmarks, average bench 54% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 87.6 1-Core 91.5 2-Core 176 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 232 31% 232 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA20) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 5.77 Parallax 3 4% 4.38 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.26 5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 86 100 127 169 168 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 456 Write 437 Mixed 374 SusWrite 167 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 24.2 82% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 198 189% 298 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 101%
Inateck ASM1153E 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 70GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 191 201 202 203 203 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18.7 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.1 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	89x
Celeron 1037UIntelBench 43%, 2,458 samples	51x
Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples	41x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	125x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	91x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	46x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	6x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	16x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	12x
TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 620 samples	12x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16