Lenovo 10BC0007US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10BC0007US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190321
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 01:52
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 202
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 365
50% 368 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 309D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 6.5
3% 5.56 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.48
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 89 96 93 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 164
Write 150
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 88.6
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73BH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback