Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '22 at 13:03
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 91.4
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 28.9
42% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 30.5
8-Core 41.9
5% 36.2 Pts
64-Core 32.6
2% 32.6 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.7
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 128GB 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 149 221 223 212 209 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 338
Write 304
Mixed 295
SusWrite 210
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 8.7
72% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 17.5
44% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
462GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 107 106 104 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 101
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 106
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425U6AFR6C-PB Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.7% Poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 9.7
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 6.6
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback